Quiz LibraryAP Research: Reviewing Academic Paper Student Samples with the Rubric
Created from Youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSguMp9fiTcvideo
Concepts covered:AP Research, academic paper rubric, student samples, holistic scoring, annotating
The video provides an in-depth review of the AP Research academic paper rubric using student samples from the 2019 cohort to illustrate high, medium, and low scoring papers. The presenters, Emily Lotte and Sam Chang, guide students through the rubric's expectations and offer detailed commentary on how to improve their academic papers by analyzing specific examples.
Table of Contents1.Comprehensive Analysis of Research Paper Elements2.Evaluating the Impact of Fortnite's Popularity on Other Video Games3.Evaluation of Research Paper Methodology and Presentation4.Effective Communication and Formatting in Academic Writing5.Critical Review of Sample J's Academic Paper
chapter
1
Comprehensive Analysis of Research Paper Elements
Concepts covered:literature review, research methods, results analysis, figures and tables, IEEE format
The chapter provides a detailed analysis of various elements of a research paper, including the introduction, literature review, methods, results, and citations. It emphasizes the importance of logical development, precise focus, and effective communication through figures and tables, adhering to the IEEE format for engineering papers.
Question 1
Literature reviews should identify gaps in existing research.
Question 2
What format is consistent with engineering papers?
Question 3
What justifies a new understanding in the results?
Question 4
CASE STUDY: You are reviewing a research paper's introduction and literature review. The paper situates the topic in varying perspectives and logically develops a gap in the literature.
All of the following are correct applications of situating a topic except:
Question 5
CASE STUDY: You are analyzing the results, analysis, and conclusions of a research paper. The paper justifies new understanding, explains limitations, and discusses future directions.
Select three correct components of a strong conclusion:
chapter
2
Evaluating the Impact of Fortnite's Popularity on Other Video Games
Concepts covered:Fortnite, academic paper, annotation, scoring criteria, methodology
The chapter discusses the evaluation process of an academic paper from the 2019 cohort, focusing on the impact of Fortnite's popularity on other video games. It emphasizes the importance of thorough annotation, scoring based on specific criteria, and reviewing different elements such as the introduction, literature review, and methodology.
Question 6
A well-defined method improves research validity.
Question 7
What score did sample A receive?
Question 8
Why did the literature review score lower?
Question 9
CASE STUDY: You are reviewing an academic paper on the impact of a popular video game. The paper lacks sufficient references to current scholarly research on video games.
All of the following are correct applications except:
Question 10
CASE STUDY: You are tasked with scoring a research paper on the popularity of video games. The paper has a narrowed focus and specific date range.
Select three correct scoring criteria:
chapter
3
Evaluation of Research Paper Methodology and Presentation
Concepts covered:methodological flaws, APA format inconsistencies, distracting tables, logical reasoning, focus shift
The chapter evaluates a research paper, highlighting its methodological flaws, inconsistent use of APA format, and the distracting nature of its tables and figures. It also discusses the paper's failure to maintain a consistent focus and logical reasoning throughout its sections.
Question 11
The paper is fully consistent with APA format.
Question 12
Why does the paper score a two in citations?
Question 13
Why does sample E score a three overall?
Question 14
CASE STUDY: A student is reviewing a research paper that claims to perform a meta-analysis but lacks alignment with its stated purpose.
All of the following are correct actions except:
Question 15
CASE STUDY: A research paper's citations are partially consistent with APA format, leading to a lower score.
Select three correct recommendations:
chapter
4
Effective Communication and Formatting in Academic Writing
Concepts covered:communication, organization, quotes, paraphrases, APA format
The chapter discusses the importance of clear communication in academic writing, emphasizing the need for proper organization and the effective use of quotes and paraphrases. It also highlights the necessity of presenting new insights in research and adhering to APA formatting standards to ensure readability and consistency.
Question 16
Quoting extensively demonstrates competence in communication.
Question 17
What is missing in the results analysis?
Question 18
Why is the APA format partially consistent?
Question 19
CASE STUDY: A colleague's paper summarizes existing knowledge but does not present new findings or insights.
All of the following enhance the paper except...
Question 20
CASE STUDY: You need to review a paper that has been marked as a '2' due to distracting text organization and inconsistent citation formats.
Select three ways to improve the paper...
chapter
5
Critical Review of Sample J's Academic Paper
Concepts covered:Sample J, research question, methodology, communication, citation
The chapter provides a detailed analysis of Sample J's academic paper, highlighting its shortcomings in narrowing down a research question and providing a replicable methodology. Despite some strengths in communication and citation, the paper overall scores low due to its broad scope and lack of new insights.
Question 21
A broad research scope is ideal for academic papers.
Question 22
How should the rubric be read?
Question 23
What overall score did sample J receive?
Question 24
CASE STUDY: You are assessing the communication component of a research paper. The paper competently communicates ideas but only summarizes findings without deeper analysis.
All of the following are correct applications of effective communication except:
Question 25
CASE STUDY: You are reviewing the overall score of a research paper based on the rubric. The paper has moments where it moves past a score of 1 but lacks consistency.
Select three correct considerations for scoring the paper out of the following:

Would you like to create and run this quiz?

yes
Created with Kwizie